Mar - Apr 2004
CPA Leadership Report
  A free bi-monthly newsletter for the accounting profession
 

CPA Leadership Report  is made possible by the generous support of the sponsoring companies. 

Promoting Continuous Improvement in CPA Firm Leadership.



 
Survey Reveals Dismal
State of Accounting Firm Marketing

 

 

    In the last issue we began a series of surveys of influential consultants to the accounting profession asking them their opinion of the effectiveness of accounting firm management. This time we asked their opinion of accounting firm marketing.

Our question was:

How effective is the marketing function in middle market CPA firms? Please rate on a scale of 1 to 10 with 1 being very ineffective and 10 being highly effective. Please include comments.

 


The average rating was 4.73.

We believe nearly every firm will benefit from the comments by our respondents.  Reviewing them in a senior management meeting may lead to changes in your marketing vision, strategy, planning, and execution. Here is a summary of the comments followed by details of the commentary.

 Summary of Comments

• The effectiveness of the marketing function depends on the experience, education, and focus of the marketing personnel.

• Vision and focus are critical problems for most firms.

• The greatest cause of ineffectiveness is lack of planning and management.

• Firms that have niche areas or teams create a better environment for marketing.

• The quality and extent of marketing is dependent on the managing partner.

• The presence of one or more rainmakers is the real springboard for growth.

• More marketing time needs to be allocated to those who are able to use it effectively.

• Firms do not differentiate themselves.

• Some firms simply “go through the motions” of marketing.

• There is too much complacency and too little accountability.

 Experience, Education, and Focus of Marketing Personnel  

According to Troy Waugh of Waugh & Company in Brentwood, Tennessee, the rating of the marketing function depends on the personnel and how their roles are defined. If there is no marketing consultant, coordinator, director, or partner leading the effort, the marketing function will be very ineffective. An administrator who manages the marketing function will create only slightly better results. A marketing director who sees his or her role as materials development only, will not do much better. A Marketing director who helps partners build business would add real effectiveness, and a marketing director who takes responsibility for driving sales could achieve excellent results.

 Vision and Focus

Bob Lewis of Visionary Marketing in Palatine, Illinois, observes that firms view marketing projects in terms of short term costs and return. A lack of immediate response often is taken as a sign of failure. Material sent to prospects and clients is either too technical or does not make a real ‘offer.’ Offering a free consultation is the same as telling a client you will not charge them for a sales call.

Lewis says:Focus is a major issue for many firms. Firms try to market in the off season and stop in the busy season. If an opportunity you have been working requires attention in March, but the firm is not there because it is focused on tax returns, it is likely to fade away. For example, the auditor selection window for employee benefits plans opens in January and closes in June. If you start looking for employee benefit plan audits in June, most of the prospects will have already signed engagement letters with other firms.”

Rick Solomon of The Solomon Company in Stony Brook, New York, has articulated a unique perspective on developing new business from current clients. He says:When a firm has a truly client centric focus, sales and marketing are integral to and inseparable from ongoing dialogue with clients to help them achieve their goals. As professionals recognize that this sort of dialogue with clients is not so much an opportunity, but a responsibility, the firm culture begins to shift.  From what we have observed, once this cultural shift occurs, the marketing function is considerably enhanced and reaches the 9 to 10 level.”

 Lack of Planning and Management

According to Larry Bildstein of the Whetstone Group in Marion, Iowa, lack of planning is the greatest cause of ineffective marketing. He says that firms often engage in random, ad hoc marketing activities. Instead they should identify target markets for their services and plan a series of consistent and frequent activities designed to exploit the potential of that market. With respect to management of the marketing function, Bildstein says: “Firms that have a full-time resource don’t really understand how to manage a professional outside of the accounting staff. Sometimes all partners are responsible for managing the marketing person or function resulting in a lack of clear focus and direction. Partners often don’t  understand what they should expect from the marketing person or function so they are either disappointed or ambivalent about it.”

 Niche Marketing

Cornell Rudov of cpasnet.com in Princeton, New Jersey, notes that middle market firms are likely to have niche areas or niche service teams, which creates a better environment for marketing. This view is confirmed by reports from CPA firms that industry and functional niches give them a competitive edge.  Clients demand to be represented by professionals who know their clients’ businesses very well, and are, therefore, positioned to help them improve their performance.

 Managing Partner’s Role

Rich Rinehart of Grant Partners in Denver, feels that many firms are dependent on an administrative assistant/marketing coordinator who reports to the managing partner. “However, with the other responsibilities of both the managing partner and the administrative assistant/marketing coordinator,  marketing is a part-time job,” says Rinehart. He adds:  “The quality and extent of marketing activities is more dependent on the managing partner and his or her direction than on the administrative assistant/marketing coordinator. Marketing paves the way for one-on-one contact with prospects by partners and others in the firm. It is an opportunity to raise the profile of the firm in the business community, showcase firm products, services, industry expertise, etc.”

 Rainmakers

     Jerry Anderson of Making Auditors Proficient, Abiline, Texas, believes that structured marketing in middle market firms is generally limited to branding the firm. He says: “The success of the firm’s marketing effort is highly dependent on the effectiveness of the individual partners as marketers. If a rainmaker exists, then the marketing efforts will appear successful. An organized marketing effort will always be somewhat successful, but the presence of the rainmaker is the springboard to growth. Successful marketing requires a plan normally designed by a marketing professional, key referral sources, and the leader within the partner group.”

 Allocation of Marketing Time

Don Scholl of D.B. Scholl, Inc., Westchester, Pa., believes that in firms where marketing is seen as a partner function, “more time needs to be allocated to those who are able to use it effectively. A few hundred hours now and then does not create short- or long-term results. Those firm members who have little talent or enthusiasm for marketing should be left alone to do what they are good at doing.”  Scholl also says: “More use should be made of trained, proven, capable, sales professionals who can actually bring in business. Too many firms rely on overworked partners to perform marketing functions. And those partners tend to be the ones who are capable of providing firm leadership and running a large book of business.”

 Firms do not Differentiate Themselves

Chandra Bhansali, of Accountants World, Stony Brook, New York, notes:  “While many middle market CPA firms are doing more proactive marketing than in the past, we have not seen many firms differentiating themselves.
 


“The success of the firm’s marketing effort is highly dependent on the effectiveness of the individual partners as marketers. If a rainmaker exists, then the marketing efforts will appear successful.
 

 

Bob Lewis says: Most firms have nothing that makes them stand out. They try to compete by offering services (tax, audit, accounting) that a prospect does not see as value-added. The marketing effort must focus on strategies to help them with profitability, operational, or time management issues. Companies will not change a commodity service for another commodity service unless a problem arises. Once a commodity manages to become differentiated, it no longer is priced as a commodity. This is the area most CPA firms cannot seem to address in their marketing efforts.”

 Going Through the Motions

Says Sally Glick, chief marketing officer at J.H. Cohn in New Jersey:  “Some firms may simply go through the motions of marketing, but they do not truly believe in the value of their efforts.”  Yet she believes that there are also many firms that accept and appreciate the efforts of marketing professionals even though they are not a part of the firm’s core competency. It is understood that marketing creates opportunities both for attracting new clients and for building greater satisfaction and loyalty with existing clients.

Gale Crosley of Crosley + Company adds: “Marketing is very narrowly defined. We need to evolve to a 'practice growth' function, versus a marketing function so that the resource is connected to the end objective of driving revenue."

Irwin Friedman, retired managing partner of a top 25 firm in Chicago, says: “It is common for CPA firms to use newsletters and brochures to market their firms; however, very few firms advance their marketing efforts using these tools in a way to create a regular flow of new client and project opportunities."

 Complacency and Accountability

Sam Allred, of Anderson, Zurmuehlen & Co. in Helena, Montana, believes that too many partners are complacent about their marketing responsibilities and few are held accountable to a written, personal marketing plan. They tend to abdicate the responsibility to the firm’s rainmakers. He says further: “When firm leaders speak of marketing, their emphasis is almost entirely on results and not on effort. Individuals within the firm can control their effort not always their results.”  Of course, this does not relieve the firm of the responsibility for driving the marketing effort towards desired outcomes.

Click on the links below to contact any of the consultants quoted in this article.

Jerry Anderson - Click here to send an e-mail.

Sam Allred - Click here to send an e-mail.

Chandra Bhansali - Click here to send an e-mail.

Gale Crosley - Click here to send an e-mail.

Irwin Freidman - Click here to send an e-mail.

Sally Glick - Click here to send an e-mail.

Bob Lewis - Click here to send an e-mail.

Rich Rinehart - Click here to send an e-mail.

Cornell Rudov - Click here to send an e-mail.

Don Scholl - Click here to send an e-mail.

Rick Solomon - Click here to send an e-mail.

Doug Thompson - Click here to send an e-mail.

Troy Waugh - Click here to send an e-mail.

 

 

 Home  ♦  About the Firm  ♦  Consulting Services    CPA Leadership Report   ♦  Articles  ♦  CPA Event Calendar  ♦  Contact Us  ♦  Tools and Products   Service Providers

© Copyright 2003 Shiffrin Management Group, Inc. publishers of the bi-monthly newsletter CPA Leadership Report.